State V. Citizen

898 So.2d 325 (La. 2005)

Facts
This case involved the separate prosecution of two indigent defendants charged with capital murder in Calcasieu Parish. There, the criminal court fund maintained the court system and the district attorney's office but not the local public defender's office. Instead, the public defender's office was funded by court fees and an allocation of state funds, which caused it to operate at a deficit. Two statutes had recently been amended to prevent the use of local parish funds to pay for appointed counsel. The attorneys appointed to represent the indigent defendants asked the court to make a determination, pursuant to Wigley, of the source of funds for the defense.

Constitutional Issue
The issue raised by this case concerned the then-current status of the funding for indigent defense throughout the state. The Court noted that the Louisiana Constitution explicitly states that "the legislature shall provide for a uniform system for securing and compensating qualified counsel for indigents." Thus, the Court emphasized, it is the state, and not the local parish, that bears the burden of funding indigent defense.

The Court continued that part of a defendant's constitutional right to the assistance of counsel includes the requirement that the state provide adequate funds for their defense. Finding that corrective measures were necessary to address the problem, the Court altered one of its rules set forth in Wigley:

"In order to assure timely representation, we now alter one of the rules previously laid down in Wigley. . . . A district judge should appoint counsel to represent an indigent defendant from the time of the indigent defendantĚs first appearance in court, even if the judge cannot then determine that funds sufficient to cover the anticipated expenses and overhead are likely to be available to reimburse counsel. The appointed attorney may then file a motion to determine funding, . . . and if the trial judge determines that adequate funding is not available, the defendant may file, at his option, a motion to halt the prosecution of the case until adequate funding becomes available. The judge may thereafter prohibit the State from going forward with the prosecution until he or she determines that appropriate funding is likely to be available."

only LPDB.LA.GOV
Upcoming Training
For more information, contact:
LPDB Training Division at
jgregory@lpdb.la.gov

LAP APPELLATE DEFENDER SEMINAR
Friday, May 31, 2019
1144 N Causeway Blvd.
Benedict’s Plantation
526 Pine Street
Mandeville, Louisiana

6.25 hours CLE, including Ethics & Professionalism

Brochure
Registration Form

For more information contact:

Chris Aberle, Director
Louisiana Appellate Project
P. O. Box 8583
Mandeville, LA 70470-8583
(985) 871-4084


Eyewitness Identification Training
Friday, May 17, 2019
10:00 a.m. – 12:15 p.m.
The Bienville Parish Courthouse
100 Courthouse Drive
Arcadia, LA 71001

The training will focus on the science of memory and eyewitness
identifications, and Act 466. Additionally, we will discuss how to
reframe and challenge Manson v. Braithwaite 432 U.S. 98 (1977) and
State v. Young, 35 So. 3d 1042 (La. 2010) given the scientific
developments and case law from other jurisdictions. A list of helpful
cases and model motions will be available at the training. We are seeking
CLE credit for the training and have capacity for approximately 55
defenders.


Click HERE for more information and the registration form.


Upcoming NAPD Trainings
2017

http://www.publicdefenders.us

NAPD offers several trainings throughout the year. Please visit NAPD's website to see more information about all of their upcoming trainings and events.